|
Updated June 19, 2001 |
Chairman, Board of Supervisors' response to FCTA letter about $9 billion excess growth
September 15, 1997 Arthur Purves, President Dear Mr. Purves: Thank you for on behalf of the Fairfax County Taxpayers Alliance regarding your concerns about the size of the County budget and the per capita tax burden for County residents. According to your letter, your chief concern appears to be that the size of the budget has increased faster than the rate of inflation and population growth since 1975. While your analysis raises some interesting points, it may not be particularly useful to attempt to compare Fairfax County budgets from 1975 and 1998, for a variety of reasons. Fairfax County has changed significantly since 1975, as has the rest of the world, and the changes have been far more profound than a simple increase in the number of residents. The relationship between local governments and the State and the Federal government has changed dramatically. New health, safety and environmental concerns have forced Fairfax County and many other institutions to change many of the ways they do business. Fairfax County is no longer a bedroom community for commuters to Washington DC, and the new residents and businesses that have come to Fairfax County have very different expectations for and have placed new demands on their local government. As illustrated in greater detail below, such changes make it difficult to draw many useful conclusions from comparisons of budgets over such a long period of time. The premise and methodology that led to your conclusions also raise some issues. For instance, although population growth is the most significant factor which drives the need for increased County services, growth in the number of households and employment (both of which have out paced population growth between 1975 and 1997) place additional burdens on County resources. For example, the demand for adequate police and fire services does not track population growth alone, and is in fact more heavily impacted by the growth in the number of households (+94%) and the amount of employment (+161%) in Fairfax County. With more households and offices to protect, more potential fires to put out and more potential targets for burglary, it is not surprising that the cost of those services has increased faster than population growth. Therefore, the notion that an absolute correlation exists between population growth and the need for County services is misleading. Changing demographics and increased citizen demand for new and enhanced services have resulted in increases in the size of the County budget. For instance, Fairfax County now has one of the highest rates of female participation in the workforce of any locality in the nation. As the number of two-worker households has increased, so has demand for safe, affordable day care service. In 1975 Fairfax County operated eight day care centers serving 411 children. In FY1998 the Department of Family Services will operate 118 School Age Child Care Centers (up 1,375 percent since 1975) serving 6,433 children (a 1,500 percent increase) in its after school program. The SACC program also raises another important point with regard to your analysis of the Fairfax County budget, which measured the size of the budget as the Total Combined General Fund Disbursements. While the SACC program is subsidized by the County, it is largely paid for with user-fees paid by the parents of participating children. So, while the SACC program will generate $13.5 million in revenue from user-fees in 1998, the entire cost of the program (teacher's salaries, benefits, etc.), including that portion offset by income, will be reflected as disbursements in the General Fund Budget, increasing the size of the Budget as you measure it. Other user-fee supported programs throughout County government also generate revenue to offset the cost of providing services, revenue that, when disbursed, increases the size of the County budget. In addition to your concerns about growth in the County budget, your letter indicates that you are concerned that, by your calculations, County per-capita taxes have increased more rapidly than the consumer price index resulting in a total of $9 billion in excess spending over the 22 year period you examined. Changes in the relationship between local governments and the Commonwealth and Federal governments since 1975 have shifted the burden for paying for many government services to County taxpayers. In 1975, 26.2 percent of all County revenue came from the Commonwealth of Virginia and the Federal Government. In 1997 that figure had dropped to 12.6 percent. Had State and Federal funding remained stable as a percentage of the budget from 1975 until this year a total of $4.8 billion would have been available to Fairfax County during that same 22 year period. Despite the pressure to increase the size of County government that comes with new growth and a continually decreasing percentage of State and Federal aid, the Board of Supervisors has actually managed to reverse that trend during the 1990's. If you look closely at the numbers you provided with your letter you will see that while, according to your figures, inflation has increased 23.67 percent since 1990, "per capita taxes", as you define them, have increased only 18.27 percent, and the non-school budget has grown only 9.36 percent per capita. To put it another way, using your methodology, the Board of Supervisors has collected $485 million less in taxes than was required to keep up with inflation and population growth since 1990. By keeping per capita budget growth under the rate of inflation, the non school budget is $124 million less in FY1998 than it would have been had spending kept pace with inflation and population growth since 1990, resulting in a total savings of $874 million during the 1990's. Thank you again for your letter, and your thoughtful analysis. As you can see, many factors have influenced the rate of budget growth since 1975. I have attached a chart which shows some of the many County services that have been initiated or substantially enhanced to keep pace with changing technology and increased demand from citizens and businesses over the last two decades. I agree that it is important to do everything possible to minimize increases in the size of the budget, as the Board has done during the 1990's. I look forward to working with you in the future as we continue to look for ways to continue this promising trend. Sincerely, Katherine K. Hanley KKH/ms cc: Members of the Board of Supervisors Comparison of County Services: FY1975 to FY1998
|