Watchdog
of the Taxpayer's Dollar Since 1956

Fairfax VA
The FAIRFAX COUNTY TAXPAYERS ALLIANCE

Note: This is Fairfax County Chairman Kate Hanley's defense of her one-half-billion-dollar real estate tax hike, enacted after she said during the 1999 supervisors' election campaign that she would not raise taxes. For the FCTA repsonse, see the FCTA press release, "Hanley, Connolly vote for forty-cent tax hike."

$560,000,000 Reduction in Revenue
Based on 43 Cent Tax Cut
Or
Tax Rate of 76 cents

Released by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
April, 2003

The $560 million reduction is predicated upon a statement from the Fairfax County Taxpayer’s Alliance that, "While assessments increased over 60 percent in four years, the supervisors made only a token reduction to the tax rate. To eliminate any tax increase arising from the 60 percent increase in residential assessments, the supervisors must set the tax rate at 76 cents, not $1.16."

 

1) If the full $560 million reduction in revenue was supported through a reduction taken only from the School Operating Transfer, the transfer would need to be cut by approximately 45 percent. The FY 2004 Advertised transfer for School Operating is $1.238 billion. The transfer after the reduction would be $690 million.

 

2) If the full $560 million reduction in revenue was supported through a reduction taken only from County operations, it would equate to the following:

a) A cut of $560 million actually equates to the total budgets of the following agencies:

b) A reduction of $560 million on the County side would equate to the elimination of the following agencies, if Public Safety agencies were excluded:

c) If we excluded Schools, and took the $560 million reduction on the County side only, spread equally among agencies, it would equate to the following reductions:

3) If the full $560 million reduction in revenue was shared by both the County and Schools and spread proportionally, based on the amounts budgeted for each of the agencies and funds as part of the FY 2004 Advertised Budget Plan it would result in the following reductions. For example, the School Operating Transfer is 48% of total disbursements FY 2004 Advertised disbursements, therefore the School Operating transfer would take a corresponding share of the reduction. Note: this does not take into account any revenue losses that may occur as a result of the reduction in direct expenditures.

School Operating Transfer Reduction = $263.8 million or approximately 48% of the total reduction. The transfer to the School Operating Fund would decrease from $1.238 billion to $975 million. Note: This would reduce the School Operating Transfer to a level slightly lower than the amount funded for school operations in FY 2001. This equates to abolishing approximately 4,900 school based positions or 26 percent of the total projected school-based full time positions. For example, the current student to teacher ratio for Elementary School classrooms is 22:1. The reduction in school based positions would increase the student to teacher ratio by approximately 40 percent. This would result in a student to teacher ratio at the state mandated cap and could jeopardize funding received from the state.

 

 

Public Safety Reduction = $67.6 million or approximately 12% of the total reduction.

Police would need to cut $28.6 million which equates to abolishing 454 police officers or 35 percent of the 1,303 sworn positions in the agency, or closing 3 of the 8 Police Stations.

Fire & Rescue would need to cut $25.4 million which equates to abolishing 470 firefighters/fire technicians or 36 percent of the 1,312 positions in the agency, or closing approximately 7 of the 35 stations.

 

Health & Welfare Reduction = $47.9 million or 9% of the total reduction.

Family Services would need to cut approximately $35.7 million which equates to the complete elimination of the Comprehensive Services Act (CSA) program which provides mandated and non-mandated services for 1,250 children; CCAP services to 575 low income children and families, the Healthy Families program which provides services for 604 families, the Foster Care program which serves 700 children, elimination of 27 SACC classrooms which equates to loss of service for 810 children, and would eliminate the agencies ability to respond to approximately 2,200 reports of suspected child abuse,

The Health Department would need to cut approximately $8.8 million which equates to the elimination of the Clinic Room Aides program which is estimated to provide 1 million visits to assist with sick and injured children and provide medications to children in the Fairfax County Public Schools in FY 2004, and reduce funding for the Community Health Care Network, which provides primary health care for low income, uninsured County residents, by 50%.

 

Parks, Recreation & Cultural Reduction = $13.1 million or approximately 2% of the total reduction.

Fairfax County Public Library would need to cut approximately $6.0 million which equates to the closure of 6 or 50 percent of the 12 Community libraries, or 3 or 37.5 percent of the 8 Regional Libraries.

Community & Recreation Services would need to cut approximately $2.4 million which equates to the elimination of all 6 Community Centers and 1 Multicultural Center, or the elimination of all 9 teen centers and all Senior Services

Other Transfers Out reduction = $81.9 million or approximately 15% of the total reduction.

CSB would need to cut approximately $17.1 million which equates to the elimination of all Mental Health out-patient and case management services, all Alcohol & Drug prevention, early intervention, and emergency services, and all Mental Retardation residential services.

Debt Service would need to eliminate all new County and Schools bond sales to generate a savings of $21 million. It should be noted that, the total reduction required based on a proportional spread is $46.9 million.

PSCC would need to cut $1.6 million in County support which equates to abolishing 27 call taker/dispatch positions or 25 percent of the total 107 authorized call taker/dispatch positions. Note: The current average speed to answer for emergency is 6 seconds, non-emergency is 35 seconds. The loss of positions would result in a dramatic increase in the speed to answer.

County Transit would need to cut approximately $4.3 million in County support which equates to a reduction of approximately 20 percent of the CONNECTOR operating subsidy which would result in a corresponding reduction in route service.

Metro would need to cut approximately $3.5 million in County support which equates to a reduction in funding for the County’s jurisdictional commitment to fund its share of WMATA annual operating budget. This reduction could result in fare increases.

All Other Reductions = $85.7 million or approximately 15% of the total reduction. This includes all Legislative Executive/Central Services Agencies, Judicial Administration, Public Works, Community Development, Fringe Benefits, and Local Cash Match for Grants.

Return to Fairfax County Taxpayers Alliance home page

Updated November 28, 2003


Copyright 1999-2008 The Fairfax County Taxpayers Alliance, Inc.
The material at this site may be reproduced in whole or in part only when the
reproduced material includes the FCTA copyright notice and the URL for this site.

Privacy Policy         Contact us at webmaster@fcta.org